Avaliação do instrumento Edmonton Symptom Assessment System em cuidados paliativos: revisão integrativa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cuidados Paliativos (CP) são prestados a pacientes fora de possibilidades terapêuticas de cura, tendo como foco o controle dos sintomas e melhora da qualidade de vida. A Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) é um instrumento para avaliar e monitorar nove sintomas fÃsicos e psicológicos em pacientes de CP. O estudo objetiva realizar revisão integrativa acerca da avaliação dos profissionais de saúde e/ou pacientes quanto ao uso da ESAS em pacientes oncológicos em Cuidados Paliativos. Foram localizados oito artigos no Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) entre 1998 e 2009. Os resultados mostraram que apesar de haver poucos estudos sobre este assunto, a ESAS é um instrumento válido para detectar e monitorar sintomas nos CP, apresentando algumas limitações. Os resultados apontam para a importância da continuidade do estudo de tradução e adaptação transcultural desta escala para o português do Brasil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.088 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".