MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7064266745

Beatty Mill account book

2024· other· en· W7064266745 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMillPARRYYardPort (circuit theory)Lock (firearm)Square (algebra)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

William Beatty, a native of County Tyrone, Ireland, settled in the Thorold area in 1835. He may have first operated a grist mill in Port Robinson. His next venture was a tannery in Thorold. With his two sons, William Jr. and James Hughes Beatty they began the Beatty sawmill operations around 1850 in nearby Grantham Township. The two operations were in close proximity to one another. The saw mill was located in Grantham Township near Lock 21 of the second Welland Canal. In 1863 the Beatty’s acquired the timber rights on a parcel of land measuring 234 square miles near Parry Sound. William Jr. managed the lumber business of the new Parry Sound Mills and James supervised the transportation operations. Shipbuilder Melancthon Simpson built several ships for the Beatty family business. They include the steamers Waubuno (1865), Cumberland (1871) and Manitoba (1871) and the propeller Asia (1873). The ships were built at Simpson’s yards in St. Catharines, Port Robinson and Thorold. In 1875, the mill was sold to Gillespie & McLean, and afterwards to McCleary & McLean. The Beatty family went on to concentrate their business in the shipping / transportation industry as well as the creation and expansion of the town of Parry Sound.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7850.728

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→