ANALIZA VREMENSKOG ODSTUPANJA POČETNOG PLANA GRAĐENJA NA STUDIJI SLUČAJA: IZVOĐENJE ARMIRANO-BETONSKIH RADOVA NA PROJEKTU IZGRADNJE ŠKOLE U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sažetak: U radu je na studiji slučaja provedena analiza vremenskog aspekta početnog plana građenja za izvođenje armiranobetonskih radova.Studija slučaja obuhvaća gradnju javne škole na području Republike Hrvatske koja je završena 2023.godine.Analizom početnog plana građenja utvrđeno je da ima nedostatke te da trajanja aktivnosti nisu u korelaciji s onim stvarno ostvarenima.Plan je u odnosu na početnih 86 radnih dana u stvarnosti trajao 272 radna dana što je prekoračenje od 216,28%.Prepoznati su glavni uzroci prekoračenja po pojedinim aktivnostima, a kao jedan od posebno učestalih pokazao se manjak komunikacije između projektnih sudionika.Dale su se preporuke za kvalitetnije vremensko planiranje te za smanjivanje odstupanja od planiranih trajanja, a koje mogu poboljšati procese upravljanja vremenom i projektom općenito.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".