Casques bleus et unifolié : le maintien de la paix et l'identité canadienne, 1956-1973
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les activités de maintien de la paix constituent une partie importante de la politique extérieure du Canada depuis l'apparition de la première opération de grande envergure en 1956. Avec les décennies, ces activités sont devenues une partie intégrante de l'image que le Canada possède au niveau international depuis la fin de la Deuxième Guerre. De plus, pendant la période de la guerre froide, la participation du Canada à ces activités s'est incorporée à l'identité nationale du pays. Ce mémoire vise à étudier l'évolution des attitudes et des opinions des Canadiens envers les opérations de maintien de la paix entre les années 1956 et 1973. Quatre moments controversés dans l'histoire du maintien de la paix canadienne seront abordés: la crise du Suez en 1956, les débuts de la crise congolaise en 1960, l'expulsion du contingent canadien du Suez en 1967, puis finalement la Commission internationale au Viêt-nam en 1973.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".