CENTRO DE CONVENCIONES Y EXPRESION CULTURAL EN LA CIUDAD DE PUNO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXTO DE CONVENCIONES NACIONAL DESARROLLO CONCEPTUAL DEL AMBITO DE CONVENCIONES DESARROLLO CONCEPTUAL DEL TURISMO PLANTA TURISTICA DESARROLLO CONCEPTUAL DE RECREACION Y ALOJAMIENTO DESARROLLO CONCEPTUAL DEL ESPACIO PÚBLICO DESARROLLO CONCEPTUAL DE LA FERIA LA IMPORTANCIA DEL CLIMA Y DEL CONFORT AMBIENTAL EN EL DISEÑO ARQUITECTONICO39 CENTRO DE CONVECCIONES DE VANCOUVER FÓRUM UNIVERSAL DE LAS CULTURAS 2004- BARCELONA ESPAÑA 51 CENTRO DE CONFERENCIA INTERNACIONAL DE AWAJI YUMEBUTAI REGLAMENTO NACIONAL DE EDIFICACIONES (RNE) REGLAMENTO DE ESTABLECIMIENTOS DE HOSPEDAJE PLAN DE DESARROLLO URBANO DE LA CIUDAD DE PUNO 2012-2022 PLAN ESTRATEGICO PARA EL MEJORAMIENTO AMBIENTAL DE LA CIUDAD DE PUNO LINEAS ESTRATEGICAS DEL PELT (PROGRAMA ESPECIAL BINACIONAL LAGO TITICACA) ANALISIS A NIVEL DISTRITAL LOCALIZACIÓN ANALISIS FISICO AMBIENTAL CLIMATOLOGÍA CLIMATOLOGÍA HELADAS CALIDAD AMBIENTAL ASPECTO SOCIAL ASPECTO ECONOMICO PRODUCTIVO ASPECTO CULTURAL PROGRAMACION ARQUITECTONICA ROL DE LA PROPUESTA COSTO FINANCIAMIENTO Y GESTION ANEXOS
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".