A Case of Double Identity: The Public and Private Faces of the Palazzo Tolomei in Siena
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Palazzo Tolomei in Siena (1270-75) was not only the private residence of a prominent local family, but was also the first legislative headquarters of the Guelph commune. It is argued that the special features and ornament of this hybrid edifice are linked to the original public function of its ground-level hall and to the city’s alliance with the papacy and its Angevin supporters after 1270. The marble she-wolf statue that stood in the adjacent square as a sign of the alleged antiquity of the city was, in fact, executed in tandem with the palace facade and is reinterpreted here as an extension of its decorative program. It is claimed that this building was the first of a new architectural type and that it served as the template for the next generation of Tuscan civic palaces, including the initial projects for the Palazzo Pubblico and the Palazzo Vecchio in Florence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.037 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".