Cagliari nel Trecento: politica, istituzioni, economia e società : dalla conquista aragonese alla guerra tra Arborea ed Aragona \n(1323-1365)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thesis of PhD of Sandro Petrucci - Cagliari in the 1300's. Politics, institutions, economy and society. From the Aragonese conquest to the war between Arborea and Aragon (1323-1365) -intends to reconstruct both the main features and the political events of a regal city in the first decades of the Aragonese domination in Sardinia. After having examined the methods of construction of a new city, through the formulation of its “constitution” and through the inhabiting of the castle by the Catalan people - a long complex process, examined also taking into consideration the social origins of the pobladors - the study intends to define the limits of the municipal power compared with the regal one, deepening some fields (city taxes, food politics). It follows the examination of the political and mercantile managing ranks from which it turns out that, if the magistracies were only assigned to the Catalans, then an important role was carried out by a large groups of Pisani and Sardinians in the local market. From the pages of the thesis a picture of the society of the Sardinian city emerges which is more articulated than that which has been described up to now by historiography. A wide range of sources, published and unknown, coming from the Barcelonian, Sardinian and Pisani archives, has been used and thanks to those it has been partially possible to overcome the difficulties deriving from the famous documentary shortage that has always made it particularly difficult to realize the social history of a Sardinian city.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".