Circo social Ecuador: intervención social en Quito, Cuenca, Guayaquil y Tena "circo social. Mucho más que una carcajada"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The “Social Circus” (Circo Social) is a project managed by the Vice-President of the \nRepublic of Ecuador and developed by the municipalities of Quito, Cuenca, Guayaquil and \nTena. A program created by Cirque du Soleil in Quebec and spread to 23 countries \nworldwide. The Social Circus aims to involve young people in circus arts to remove them \nfrom the risk of participating in activities of violence, drugs, alcohol, and prostitution, \namong others. \nThis thesis is the result of four months of research and consists of three parts. The first is a \nresearch project of the Social Circus in Ecuador, especially in Quito. The second is a \nwritten document, a provisional toll of which is the Social Circus of Ecuador until the date \nof publication of thesis. Within the written documentary there is a section that describes \nwhat was the project of “Youth Circus”, a circus with objectives similar to the Social \nCircus. And the third part is a television documentary of what was the Circus of the Youths \nand the beginning and objectives of which is the Ecuador Social Circus in 2012.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".