MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064749507

Computational design of two-dimensional materials for energy conversion

2023· dissertation· en· W7064749507 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCompute CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsEnergy transformationEnergy (signal processing)Efficient energy useEnergy consumptionWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The discovery of graphene in 2004 has ignited a surge of interest in various twodimensional (2D) materials, such as transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), 2D group IIInitrides (2D III-nitrides), and black phosphorus (BP).Thanks to their unique structures, 2D materials exhibit distinct properties including high conductivity, large specific surface area and high catalytic activity, being ideal candidates for a variety of applications.Recently, 2D materials have demonstrated great promise in energy-related applications.Particularly, 2D materials like 2DTMDCs have been extensively studied as effective electrocatalysts and photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER).However, many 2D materials show limited HER performance due to the low density of catalytic sites in their structures.To overcome this limitation, various strategies have been developed to engineer the 2D material structures so as to improve HER performance.Among different engineering strategies, phase boundary and alloying can provide attractive options as they are able to enhance the density of active sites while retaining the structural integrity of 2D materials.However, systematic research on engineering 2D materials via phase boundaries and alloying for catalytic applications remains rather limited, with the mechanisms underlying enhanced catalytic performance elusive.Such lack of mechanistic understanding is a critical obstacle hindering rational design of the properties of 2D materials in a predictable manner.In this regard, the present thesis systematically studied the two important engineering strategies of 2D materials, i.e., via phase boundaries and alloying, and their roles in improving the HER performance.The focus is placed mainly on 2D TMDCs as the representative 2D material group, but with other 2D materials, i.e., 2D III-nitride alloys, also considered for generality.Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were employed as the computational tool to examine Pengfei Ou and Dr. Fanchao Meng for their kind assistance during the initial stage of my research.Many thanks to all my friends, especially Chuhong Wang, Tiantian Yin and Xun Du, who always

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207