Composición de Tres Bambucos Fiesteros para Cuarteto de Clarinetes “Aproximación Sonora a las Bandas Tradicionales Tolimenses de Vientos”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este documento se presenta el proceso de investigación-creación que llevó a la composición de tres bambucos fiesteros para cuarteto de clarinetes enfocados en el tratamiento tímbrico. Inicialmente, se presentaron los recursos tímbricos empleados en el formato de banda tradicional tolimense de vientos por los compositores referentes: Emiliano Lucena, Eleuterio Lozano y Gonzalo Sánchez, a través del análisis musical de las composiciones presentes en la grabación San Pedro en el Espinal, la fiesta del siglo, hecha en 1981 por la agrupación Banda Vieja de El Espinal. Posteriormente, se presenta la investigación realizada sobre cuartetos de clarinete en Colombia, bambucos del repertorio colombiano, recursos tímbricos adicionales propios del clarinete soprano y el clarinete bajo y su aplicación en las tres composiciones. Se incluye una descripción sobre cómo el cuarteto de clarinetes asume el rol de los instrumentos de la banda tolimense tradicional de vientos y el paso a paso llevado a cabo en la creación de las tres obras.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".