Confiabilidade intraclasse da Alberta Infant Motor Scale na versão brasileira
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Objetivou-se analisar a confiabilidade intraclasse da escala Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS), na versão brasileira, em crianças pré-termo e a termo. Estudo metodológico, realizado de novembro de 2009 a abril de 2010, com 50 crianças atendidas em duas instituições públicas de Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil. As crianças foram agrupadas conforme a idade gestacional em pré-termo e a termo e avaliadas no laboratório de comunicação de uma instituição pública ou em domicílio por três avaliadores. Os índices de correlação intraclasse para as categorias prono, supino, sentado e em pé variaram de 0,553 a 0,952, mantendose em sua maioria acima de 0,800. Apenas no item em pé do terceiro avaliador o índice foi 0,553. Quanto ao escore total e ao percentil, os índices variaram de 0,843 a 0,954. A Escala mostrou-se um instrumento confiável para avaliar o desempenho motor grosso de crianças brasileiras, particularmente as cearenses, independente da idade gestacional ao nascer."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".