MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064835681

Community Mangrove Management in Pred Nai Village, Thailand

2007· other· en· W7064835681 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUSC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast) · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsMangroveLoggingForest managementHectareCommunity forestryRural community
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case study describes forest management activities undertaken in a mangrove forest by the Pred Nai Community Forestry Group in Thailand. The village of Pred Nai is in Trat Province near the border of Cambodia. The mangrove is one of the last surviving mangrove forests on Thailand’s eastern seaboard. The portion within Pred Nai covers 1,728 hectares (ha) (including 320 ha of plantation). Commercial logging since the 1940s has destroyed or degraded a significant area of mangrove forests in and near Pred Nai. This case study discusses community action to restore the mangrove, beginning with attempts to prevent commercial logging for charcoal production. This was followed by the restoration of mangrove trees through plantations, as well as protection to allow regeneration. This evolved into active management of the mangroves to increase the production of aquatic species. Although the mangrove forest is technically under the authority of the Royal Forest Department, this has not prevented community action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUSC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast)Same topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207