Consolidation du lien au territoire de femmes innues et atikamekw par la grossesse et l'accouchement / Consolidation of the connection to the land of Innu and Atikamekw women through pregnancy and childbirth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé La présente recherche participative porte sur la consolidation du lien au territoire des femmes innues et atikamekw par la grossesse et l’accouchement. Les récits recueillis permettent de mieux comprendre l’expérience de la maternité de ces femmes, de documenter leurs pratiques sur le territoire ainsi que les transformations de celles-ci, afin de déterminer comment elles ont été influencées par les pratiques coloniales. Outre l’effacement du rôle des femmes autochtones dans les sphères de gouvernance de leur société respective, plusieurs interventions gouvernementales ont accéléré définitivement la sédentarisation qui va de pair avec l’hospitalisation imposée. Cet indéniable effritement du système social lié à la vie en territoire a contribué à entraver l’importance des naissances sur celui-ci et a ainsi participé à une modification profonde des territorialités des femmes innues et atikamekw. L’analyse des récits montre comment la mutation des pratiques d’accompagnement des femmes enceintes, du territoire à la communauté, puis de la communauté à l’hôpital a provoqué la perte de la pratique des sages-femmes en plus d’accélérer l’imposition d’une vision biomédicale de la grossesse. Cette délocalisation multiple des lieux d’accouchement a précipité la perte graduelle de contrôle que les femmes enceintes pouvaient exercer sur leur accouchement. Pour autant, le lien au territoire des femmes innues et atikamekw ne s’est pas perdu, mais s’est plutôt transformé. Les solutions proposées afin de revitaliser ce lien se résument notamment en la réintroduction de la pratique des sages-femmes et de quelques cérémonies et rituels, en plus de la transmission des savoirs aux jeunes générations portant sur les lieux significatifs du territoire et sur la fabrication de médecines et d’objets traditionnels liés aux grossesses et aux accouchements. Abstract This participatory research focuses on the consolidation of the connection to the land of Innu and Atikamekw women through pregnancy and childbirth. The stories collected have enabled us to better understand these women’s experiences of motherhood, to document their traditional land-based practices and transformations in order to determine how these women have been influenced by colonial standards. In addition to suppressing the role of Indigenous women in the areas of governance within their respective societies, several government interventions have definitively accelerated the sedentarization that goes hand-in-hand with forced hospitalization. This undeniable erosion of the social system associated with life on the land has contributed to hindering the importance of births on the land and has also been instrumental in deep-seated changes in the territoriality of Innu and Atikamekw women. An analysis of participants’ testimonies shows how the shift in practices to assist pregnant women, from the land to the community, and then from the community to the hospital, has led to the loss of midwifery practices and to the acceleration of an imposed biomedical vision of pregnancy. These multiple relocations of birthing environments have precipitated a gradual loss of control that pregnant women could exercise over their deliveries. Nevertheless, the connection of Innu and Atikamekw women to the land has not been lost, it has been transformed. The solutions proposed to revitalize this bond can be summed up by the reintroduction of midwifery practices, the revival of certain ceremonies and rituals, the transmission to younger generations of knowledge about significant places on the land, the preparation of traditional medicines and crafting of objects related to pregnancy and childbirth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".