MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064907352

02 - Complexité de systèmes de correction d'erreurs

2005· article· en· W7064907352 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace (Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsBinary numberComputational complexity theoryBlock (permutation group theory)Unary operationTruth table
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estimating the complexity of implementation for a coding/decoding system is a delicate question. There is usually
\nno unique answer. We can make a rought distinction between :
\n- algorithmic complexity ;
\n— hardware complexity, corresponding to the number of logical gates and binary memories contained in a codin g
\nor decoding device.
\nFor the first notion in the case of block codes, one deals mostly with arithmetic complexity . We survey the mai n
\nexisting estimations "practical" and asymptotical while trying to distinguish between the operations in an extensio n
\nfield and those on the ground field. We illustrate the second notion with an example showing the limitations o f
\nsome evaluations .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDSpace (Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique)Same topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207