MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064971536

Deep Learning Applied to Animal Linguistics

2023· dissertation· en· W7064971536 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Deep learningVariety (cybernetics)Process (computing)Animal behaviorRepertoireField (mathematics)Natural (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Even nowadays, people have only a very limited understanding about animal communication. Scientists are still far from identifying statistically relevant, animal-specific, and recurring linguistic paradigms. However, combined with the associated situation-specific behavioral observations, these patterns represent an indispensable basis for decoding animal communication. In order to derive statistically significant communicative and behavioral hypotheses, sufficiently large audiovisual data volumes are essential covering the animal-specific communicative and behavioral repertoire in a representative, natural, and realistic manner. Hence, passive audiovisual monitoring techniques are increasingly deployed to obtain more natural insights, since the recording is performed in an unobtrusive fashion to minimize disruptive factors and simultaneously maximizing the probability of observing the entire inventory of natural communicative and behavioral paradigms in adequate numbers. Nevertheless, time- and human-resource constraints hamper scientists to efficiently process large-scale noise-heavy data archives, incorporating massive amounts of hidden audiovisual information, to derive an overall and bigger picture about animal linguistics. Thus, in order to perform a deep and detailed data analysis to derive real-world representations, the support of machine-based data-driven algorithms is a fundamental prerequisite. In the scope of this doctoral thesis, a hybrid approach between machine (deep) learning and animal bioacoustics is presented, applying a wide variety of different and novel algorithms to analyze large-scale, noise-heavy, audiovisual, and animal-specific data repositories in order to provide completely new insights into the field of animal linguistics. Due to their complex social, communicative, and cognitive abilities, the largest member of the dolphin family – the killer whale (Orcinus orca) – was chosen as target species and prototype for this study. In northern British Columbia one of the largest animal-specific bioacoustic archives – the Orchive – was acquired by the OrcaLab and used as major data foundation, further extended by additional acoustic and behavioral data material, collected during project-internal fieldwork expeditions along the West Coast of Canada in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2022. A broad spectrum of publicly available deep learning-based algorithms is presented, originally developed on killer whales, but also transferable to other vocalizing animal species, while addressing the following essential acoustic and image-related biological research questions: (1) signal segmentation – robust, efficient, and fully-automated detection of killer whale sound types, (2) sound denoising – signal enhancement of diverse killer whale vocalizations, (3) call type identification – supervised, semi-supervised, and unsupervised deep architectures to recognize vocal killer whale paradigms, (4) sound type separation – signal segregation of overlapping killer whale vocalizations, (5) individual recognition – image-based deep learning framework to identify killer whale individuals, (6) sound source localization – underwater identification of vocalizing killer whale individuals, (7) signal generation – artificial and representative killer whale signal production, and (8) animal independence – adaption and generalization of developed killer whale-related deep learning concepts to other species-specific bioacoustic data volumes. All the inventive and publicly available machine (deep) learning frameworks demonstrate auspicious results and provide totally unprecedented analysis techniques, facilitating more profound interpretations of massive, animal-specific, and audiovisual data volumes, all together building the imperative foundation to significantly push not only the communicative and behavioral understanding of killer whales, but the entire research field of animal bioacoustics and linguistics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207