MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065045870

D4 - Gin in Tschlin - Weisstannen von besonderem genetischen Interesse

2001· article· de· W7065045870 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) · 2001
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLunaticQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<em>Der WEP Unterengadin weist im Gebiet S-chalun bei Tschlin (Nr. 99 auf der Karte in Heftmitte) einen Wald von besonderem genetischen Interesse aus (BGI-Wald). Was hat es mit diesem Bestand auf sich? Wie ist es zu dieser Ausscheidung gekommen und was geschieht nun in diesem Gebiet?</em><br />Im Waldentwicklungsplan Unterengadin heisst die Fläche kurz «Gin-7». Wer jetzt an Wacholderschnaps denkt, liegtfalsch. «Gin» steht hier für Wälder von besonderer Wichtigkeit für den Naturschutz (Gods cun importanza particulara per la protecziun da la natüra). Der kleine Bestand, der nordexponiert auf einer Terrasse am Eingang des Val da Tschera stockt, zählt weniger als 300 erwachsene Tannen. Was macht ihn aus genetischer Sicht so interessant?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207