A dinâmica sócio-económica da comunidade rural alentejana de Figueira dos Cavaleiros
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A presente dissertação, inserida no âmbito da candidatura à obtenção do grau de Mestre em Sociologia, incide sobre a dinâmica socio-económica verificada na comunidade rural alentejana de Figueira dos Cavaleiros, no último quarto de século. Contrariando a tendência demográfica actual da região a que pertence, esta comunidade viu aumentar, nos últimos 30 anos, a sua população em cerca de 2 centenas de habitantes, o que corresponde a um aumento percentual na ordem dos 23,5%. Estes dados tornam-se tanto mais relevantes se considerarmos que entre 1960 e 1991 o distrito de Beja perdeu, na sua globalidade, cerca de 11 habitantes por Km2. Face a este contexto, o crescimento demográfico registado nesta pequena população justificaria, certamente, só por si, a realização do presente estudo. Contudo, este crescimento não foi apenas físico e demográfico, foi também económico e cultural. Foi esta dinâmica sócio-económica, normalmente, associada, pelas gentes locais, à necessidade de mão-de-obra originada pelas culturas de regadio, fomentadas pelo sistema de regadio com origem na Barragem de Odivelas, que esteve na base do presente estudo. /*** Abstract - The present dissertation, for the obtention of a Master's degree in Sociology, studies the socio-economic dynamic of a specific community in a rural Portuguesa region, the Alentejo. This community is called Figueira dos Cavaleiros, and the research is centered in the last quarter of the XX century. Contradicting the present demographic tendency of Alentejo region, this specific community saw, in the last 30 years, an increase of two hundred inhabitants, which means a raise of 23,5%. And if we consider that between 1960 and 1991 the district of Beja lost globally around 11 inhabitants per Km2. These data have a specific meaning. Therefore, the demographic growth of this small population justifies, itself, the present study. However the growth was not just physical and demographic, but also economic and cultural. This socio-economic dynamic, usually co-related to the manpower needs was originated by the irrigation system of Odivelas Dam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".