Dart shooting and postcopulatory sexual selection in the garden snail Helix aspersa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the final stage of courtship, the garden snail Helix aspersa attempts to stab its mating partner with a mucus-coated calcareous "love dart." I present evidence supporting two predictions of the most promising hypothesis for the adaptive significance of this behavior: that the dart serves to increase the reproductive success of the shooter by increasing the numerical representation of its sperm in the recipient's storage organ (the sperm loading hypothesis). First, I demonstrate that once-mated snails store more of the sperm transferred by successful shooters than by unsuccessful shooters. Second, I demonstrate that this biased storage results in higher paternity scores for successful shooters relative to unsuccessful shooters in the clutches of multiply mated recipients. Moreover, I present evidence that body size and mating order influence the outcome of sperm competition in snails. Finally, I propose a novel mechanism to explain the observed pattern of sperm utilization in H. aspersa based on the motility of stored allosperm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".