MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065150612

Distribution, Burden, and Impact of Acute Gastroenteritis in Dominica,\n2009-2010

2014· other· en· W7065150612 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBioline International (Bioline International) · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research CentrePublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsAcute gastroenteritisIncidence (geometry)PandemicDiseaseAcute diarrheaDiarrheaMEDLINE
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is defined as the passage of three or more loose or liquid stools per day and is also known as acute diarrhoeal disease.It has long been recognized as a leading cause of child morbidity and mortality in the world; about two billion cases of diarrhoeal diseases are reported globally every year (3).The recent outbreak of cholera in Haiti reinforced acknowledgement of the ongoing threat of AGE in the Caribbean (4).Data collected by the Caribbean Epidemiology Centre (CAREC) from its member countries show high and increasing numbers of reported cases of AGE (5); however, the exact distribution and burden of AGE is not fully known at this time.In Dominica, there are syndromic and laboratorybased surveillance systems for AGE.These data are reported weekly to Health Information Unit of the Ministry of Health.Syndromic AGE data in Dominica indicate that AGE is the second-most common communicable disease syndrome after acute respiratory illness (ARI) and that 1,510 and 1,020 cases of AGE (in <5 years and >5 years age-groups) Distribution, Burden, and Impact of Acute Gastroenteritis in Dominica, 2009-2010

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.838

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBioline International (Bioline International)Same topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207