A Comparison of heat exposure in fire resistance test furnaces controlled by plate thermometers and by shielded thermocouples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Harmonization of fire resistance furnaces is a major challenge facing the standard writing organizations. Efforts are being considered by the ASTM E05 committee to investigate the factors that affect such harmonization among test furnaces. The factors under consideration by ASTM include furnace specifications, the method used to control furnace temperature and structural load. This paper is a contribution to the efforts being made for identifying a method that can be used to control the fire resistance furnaces. This paper presents and discusses the results of 12 heat exposure full-scale tests: 6 using a floor furnace and the other 6 using a wall furnace. These tests were conducted to investigate the use of two methods for controlling furnace temperature: one by use of the shielded thermocouples and the other by use of the so-called Plate Thermometers. Also, tests were conducted to investigate the heat exposure received by the specimen in fire resistance furnaces controlled by either the Plate Thermometers or by shielded thermocouples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".