An Effectiveness Trial of an Exercise Physiologist Service to Improve Quality of Life in Adults with Severe Mental Illness: Protocol for the MOVEMENT Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Justin J Chapman,1– 3 Dan Siskind,2,4,5 Alison R Yung,6 Yong Yi Lee,5,7,8 Urska Arnautovska,2,5 James G Scott,4,9,10 Kylie Burke,11– 13 Eva Malacova,14 Nicole Korman,2,4,5 Marianne Wyder,2 Meg A Doohan,1 Shelley E Keating,15 Stephen Parker,4,13 Max E Walker,1 Di Hu,1 Jake O’Brien,16 Geoffrey Lau,2 Gregory F Pratt,17 Simon Rosenbaum,18 Jackie Curtis,18,19 Mary Lou Chatterton,7 Lisa Simmons,20 Amanda J Wheeler1,3,21 1School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Centre for Mental Health, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia; 2Addictions and Mental Health Service, Metro South Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 3ALIVE National Centre for Mental Health Research, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; 4School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia; 5Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 6School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia; 7School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 8School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia; 9Child and Youth Mental Health Service, Children’s Health Queensland, Brisbane QLD, Australia; 10Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 11Parenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; 12Australian Government through the Australian Research Council’s Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 13Metro North Mental Health Service, Metro North Health, Herston, QLD, Australia; 14QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia; 15School of Human Movement and Nutrition Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; 16Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Metro South Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 17Mental Health and Genomics, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 18Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 19Mindgardens Neuroscience Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 20Australian Institute of Tropical Health & Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia; 21Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Auckland University, Auckland, New ZealandCorrespondence: Justin J Chapman, Griffith University Centre for Mental Health 170 Kessels road Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, 4111, Tel +61432 299 240, Email justinjchapman@gmail.comIntroduction: Exercise can improve the quality of life (QoL) of people with severe mental illness (SMI); however, many experience practical, psychosocial, and socioeconomic barriers to commencing and maintaining exercise. This protocol describes a study aiming to assess the effectiveness of an Accredited Exercise Physiologist (AEP) service for improving QoL in adults with SMI.Methods and Analysis: This is a prospective non-randomised effectiveness trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an AEP service within mental healthcare settings. Participants will be adults (18+ years) with SMI recruited from public mental health services and community organizations. The primary outcome is QoL assessed using the Recovering Quality of Life questionnaire (ReQoL) assessed at baseline, 3-month and 6-month follow-up. Participants will be invited to a study in which they may self-select to access an AEP service for six months. Self-reported health, demographic and psychosocial influences will be measured and incorporated in analyses as covariates. This is a pragmatic observational approach to evaluating effectiveness, in which participants who attend the AEP service will be compared with those who decline. Reasons for non-participation will be explored, and rates of recruitment and adherence will be examined. Findings will provide insight into implementing AEP services in mental health settings.Ethics and Dissemination: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Metro South Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2024/QMS/109698). We plan to submit a manuscript of the results to a peer-reviewed journal. Results will be presented at conferences, community and consumer forums and hospital grand rounds.Trial Registration: The trial is registered under the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12624001148561).Keywords: physical activity, implementation, mental health, health services, recovery, lifestyle intervention
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".