MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7065175332

Elastic tethers remain functional during anaphase arrest in partially-lysed crane-fly spermatocytes, and in non-lysed spermatocytes treated with microtubule inhibitors

2024· other· en· W7065175332 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnaphaseKinetochoreMicrotubuleChromosome segregationMitosisLysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elastic tethers connect corresponding arms (telomeres) of partner chromosomes during anaphase segregation; they exert anti-poleward (backward) forces on the poleward-moving chromosomes. This thesis examined how arresting anaphase chromosomal segregation affected elastic tether function. Various dilutions of a standard immunofluorescent lysis buffer were used to partially lyse anaphase-I spermatocytes of crane flies. Partial cell lysis deactivated the anaphase spindle apparatus and arrested anaphase chromosomal segregation. Elastic tethers remained functional, and backward tether forces acting on chromosomes were able to cause backward chromosomal movements. Backward-moving chromosomes were attached to their kinetochore microtubules (kMTs) which might have been slowing them down. To test whether detaching chromosomes from their kMTs could enable their faster backward movements, anaphase spermatocytes were treated with various microtubule inhibitors to disassemble kMTs. The inhibitors led to anaphase segregation arrest, and backward chromosomal movements. However, the drugs were unable to disassemble the stable, acetylated kMTs, and allow faster backward movements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)→Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations→French-language works237,207→