MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065283406

Designing and Building a Low Energy Neutron Source

2025· dissertation· en· W7065283406 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutronBeamlineNeutron sourceProtonParticle acceleratorCurrent (fluid)Intensity (physics)Low energy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Department of Physics, together with the NEWS-G collaboration at Queen’s University are developing Spherical Proportional Counters (SPC) aimed for dark matter detection research. The response of SPCs to nuclear recoils with the interaction of the hypothetical dark matter particles can be best calibrated with a high intensity beams of medium energy neutrons (~10 keV – 100 keV). Presently, the number of facilities having such neutron sources are quite low. This project aims to design and build a medium energy neutron source at the proton accelerator facility of the Reactor Materials Testing Laboratory (RMTL). The proton accelerator at RMTL can provide protons with energies up to 8 MeV and a current of 35 µA. Our beamline will utilize protons of around 2 MeV energy and a maximum current of 20 µA. This high current will provide us more neutron intensity compared to other facilities. As the neutron intensity increases, the probability of them interacting with the gas molecules in the SPC also increases giving the physics department a better chance of calibrating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicLaser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207