MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7065296299

Credit supply and the rise in sovereign debt risk in the Eurozone

2013· book-chapter· en· W7065296299 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwap (finance)Credit default swapMarket liquidityDebtCredit riskQuarter (Canadian coin)Panel dataGovernment debtSovereign debtGovernment (linguistics)Financial crisis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the paper is to establish whether, and to what extent, a rise in sovereign debt risk can cause a credit crunch. By conducting an empirical analysis of the eurozone countries for the period between the first quarter of 2010 and the last quarter of 2011, we first estimate the potential losses for banks on different kinds of financial assets by using credit default swap prices. Then, using a panel data estimate, we show that potential losses on government securities have a negative impact on credit supply, and that this impact is greater than that on other domestic or foreign assets. This evidence can be attributed to the role of government securities in banks' liquidity management. In the recent euro crisis the ECB has properly adopted measures aimed at relieving the lack of liquidity suffered by the banks of countries hit by a deterioration in their public debt worthiness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→