MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065313192

Design and development of a new rockbold load measuring device

2002· article· en· W7065313192 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du TravailMcGill University
KeywordsElectronic equipmentElectronic instrument
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cliquez ici pour la version française de ce rapport_x000D_ Une nouvelle technologie permettant de mesurer la charge axiale des boulons d'ancrage mécaniques et des « rebars » (boulons à la résine) dans les mines souterraines a été conçue et développée en laboratoire. Cette technologie repose sur un système désigné du nom de SAFEBOLT (Stress And Force Evaluator in BOLTs), qui réunit trois composantes : 1) le mesureur de charge SAFEBOLT installé dans la tête des boulons, 2) un module d'affichage et 3) un câble de raccordement. Un banc d'essai adapté a été construit en laboratoire afin d'assurer le calibrage et la vérification des boulons instrumentés avant qu'ils ne soient envoyés dans les mines pour y être utilisés._x000D_ Trois mines souterraines ont pris part au projet, soit les mines Doyon, Bousquet et Niobec. Aussi bien des boulons à ancrage mécanique que des boulons à la résine ont été instrumentés et installés sur le terrain. Nous avons fabriqué et monté avec succès les instruments SAFEBOLT sur des boulons d'ancrage et des « rebars » d'une longueur de 5 pi (1,5 m) à 7 pi (2,1 m). Les leçons tirées des premiers essais sur le terrain ont permis d'améliorer la conception du dispositif monté sur la tête des boulons de telle sorte qu'ils résistent à la manutention brutale dont ils font l'objet en cours d'installation, de même qu'aux effets subséquents des dynamitages survenant dans les parages._x000D_ Les installations effectuées sur le terrain démontrent que la technologie SAFEBOLT promet de devenir un excellent outil de suivi de la charge des boulons, dans la mesure où elle est simple à utiliser, où elle s'est révélée fiable et où elle bénéficie désormais d'une construction robuste. Le présent rapport souligne les caractéristiques et les limites de la technologie SAFEBOLT. Un guide d'utilisation a également été joint en annexe._x000D_ Abstract_x000D_ A new technology for the measurement of axial load on rockbolts and rebars in underground mines has been designed and developed in the laboratory. The technology is known as SAFEBOLT (Stress And Force Evaluator in BOLTS). The SAFEBOLT system consists of three components: 1) the SAFEBOLT device installed in the bolt head, 2) a readout unit, and 3) a connecting cable. A special test rig was constructed in the laboratory to enable the calibration and verification of the instrumented bolt before they are sent to the mines for installation._x000D_ Three underground mines have participated in the project, namely Doyon, Bousquet and Niobec. Both mechanically anchored rockbolts and rebars were instrumented and installed in the field. The SAFEBOLT instruments were successfully fabricated and installed on rockbolts and rebars of 5 to 7 foot-long. The lessons learned from the first field trials helped to improve the design of the instrument connector on the bolt head to sustain the severe handling during the installation, and subsequent effects due to nearby blasting._x000D_ Field installations show that SAFEBOLT technology has the potential to become an excellent tool for monitoring the load on bolts, as it is simple to use, reliable and has now a rugged construction. The report highlights the features and limitations of SAFEBOLT technology. A user’s manual is presented at the end of the report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.114 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207