Design and Implementation of an IoT Platform for Flood Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flooding, a major natural calamity, severely threatens communities and infrastructures in areas susceptible to floods. Consequently, implementing an Internet of Things (IoT)-based flood monitoring system becomes crucial. Existing flood monitoring systems lack a comprehensive and scalable IoT platform to collect real-time data from diverse sensors efficiently, visualize flood information, and provide accurate water level forecasts. This thesis proposes a complete system designed to address the challenges associated with efficient data collection and flood monitoring from diverse IoT sensors. \n \nOur proposition involves creating and deploying a centralized system known as HYDROSIGHT, which facilitates the real-time gathering, monitoring, and visualization of flooding-related sensor data. HYDROSIGHT system also provides a log monitoring feature for effective debugging and troubleshooting. \nThe IoT environment for flood monitoring and prediction system was designed to promote sustainability and autonomy by preferring sensors with minimal footprints and compatibility with solar panels. The system architecture leverages a 4G network for seamless data transmission. \n \nTo validate the practical applicability of the proposed design,HYDROSIGHT system was tested at two municipalities of Quebec, namely Terrebonne, and Lac-Supérieur. In addition, the platform was also deployed at the Ericsson facility in Montreal to test the 5G capabilities. The deployment in these locations allowed us to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the HYDROSIGHT system in a real flood monitoring environment. \n \nIn addition to implementing the IoT testbed, a preliminary machine learning tool was developed on water level forecasting. In this experiment, we opted for an online machine-learning approach, recognizing the significance of real-time updates and low computational resources of IoT devices. Leveraging the constantly updating data from HYDROSIGHT, we trained and tested our online machine-learning model, enhancing its forecasting capabilities. \n \nWe conducted a comparative analysis to understand the advantages of online machine learning over traditional batch learning. This analysis involved examining the water level forecasting results obtained from both methods using time series data from the HYDROSIGHT system deployed at Lac-Supérieur in Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".