MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065326591

Distribution and Status of the Lesser Prairie Chicken in Oklahoma

2018· other· en· W7065326591 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRangelandRange (aeronautics)Spring (device)Distribution (mathematics)PopulationPopulation decline
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The range, population size, and status of the lesser prairie chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) in western Oklahoma were determined during a 2 l/2 year study initiated in July 1977. The contemporary range includes several spatially isolated segments totaling 2,791 km; a decline of 55% in 20 years. Sand sagebrush (Artemisia filifolia) rangeland comprises 68% of the range and occurs primarily along the North Canadian (Beaver) River in Texas, Beaver, Harper, and Woodward counties. Shinnery oak (Quercus havardii) rangeland comprises most of the remaining range and occurs in Woodward, Ellis, Roger Mills, and Beckham counties. The spring population was estimated at 7,500 birds in 1979; 58% inhabited rangelands of sand sagebrush and 40% shinnery oak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma)Same topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207