MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065368773

Early Substance Use and Later Depressive Symptoms Among Canadian Adolescents: Examining the Association Using Intersectionality Theory

2021· dissertation· en· W7065368773 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectrical and Electromagnetic Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubstance useSocioeconomic statusDepressive symptomsAssociation (psychology)Poisson regressionDepression (economics)IntersectionalitySubstance abusePoison control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests adolescent substance use may lead to depression and earlier initiation may be especially problematic. Social identities or positions defined by such factors as gender, race, or socioeconomic status (SES), have been associated with adolescent substance use and depression; however, their effects have primarily been examined independently, whereas Intersectionality Theory emphasizes the potential synergistic effects of multiple aspects of individual identity.
\nOBJECTIVES: First, to describe early substance users (<14 years) in Canada while considering intersecting social positions by gender, race, and SES; second, to examine the association between early substance use and depressive symptoms later in adolescence; and third, to investigate differences in this relationship at varying intersections of gender, race, and SES.
\nMETHODS: Data were from the 2017/2018 Canadian Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study, providing a nationally representative sample of adolescents in grades 9 and 10. Descriptive and multilevel, multivariable modified Poisson regression analyses were performed to estimate the relative risks for the association between early substance use and later depressive symptoms. Multiplicative interaction and stratification by two- and three-way combinations of gender, race, and SES were used to assess effect modification.
\nRESULTS: Nearly one in four (23.5%) adolescents reported early substance use, and this proportion differed significantly across subgroups at intersecting social positions, with subgroups that included lower SES generally displaying a greater proportion of reported early substance use. The risk of depressive symptoms was significantly higher among those who reported early substance use compared to those who did not (RR 1.23; 95% CI 1.16-1.31). Combinations of gender, race and SES were not found to modify the relationship between early substance use and depressive symptoms; post hoc power calculations indicated that there was insufficient power to detect interacting effects between intersecting social positions and early substance use in predicting later depressive symptoms. 
\nCONCLUSION: Preventing substance use in early adolescence, such as by delaying substance use initiation, may help prevent depression overall in youth. As the proportion of reported early substance users differed by subgroups of intersecting social positions, interventions aimed at preventing early substance use should use a targeted, intersectional approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it