El conflicto armado en la comuna 13: Obstáculos y posibilidades para la participación y el desarrollo organizativo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El artículo expone cómo durante el conflicto ~rmado en la comuna 13 de la ciudad de Medellín, el trabajo organizativo y la participación comunitaria se afectaron por el recorte de las libertades de organización, movilización y expresión como consecuencia de los órdenes autoritarios establecidos por los grupos armados, y de las confrontaciones violentas en la lucha por el control territorial.La autora también muestra cómo a pesar de las restricciones, en medio del conflicto armado, se da una reactivación y fortalecimiento de las organizaciones, debido de una parte a los procesos, recursos y fortalezas internas, en términos de resistencias, liderazgos y capacidad organizativa, y por otra, por condiciones externas relacionadas con los cambios generados a partir de la Constitución de 1991, el respaldo de ONG y las políticas de la administración municipal.Todo lo cual es un potencial para el desarrollo social de esta comuna.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".