Enhancing connectivity through corridors for the dispersal and biodiversity conversation of forest herbaceous species in agroecosystems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Existing stresses of fragmentation on plant diversity and range dynamics will be exacerbated by climatic changes that shift bioclimatic regions northward.It is often stated that connectivity-enhancement through the establishment of corridors could facilitate the movement and conservation of plants, providing a timescale of dispersal and establishment relevant to rapid bioclimatic change.We tested this hypothesis focusing on forest herbaceous species dispersing through agroecosystems in southern Quebec using regenerating hedgerow-corridors.Most species (n= 31 of 42) recorded in regional forests were also found in hedgerows, though species rates of dispersal through hedgerows, recorded at ≤ 2.50 m year -1 , indicate corridors would not benefit the dispersal of these species in rapidly changing conditions.Forest species tend to reassemble in corridors with time, but our results suggest that establishing connectivity would only conserve agroecosystem plant diversity at long timescales; dispersal limitations and possibly environmental conditions represent a severe barrier for most species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".