MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065404172

Distribution Characteristics of Total Mercury in Imported Coals at Shanghai Port

2014· article· en· W7065404172 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMercury (programming language)CoalSulfurSulfidePollution
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As China swings from being a net coal exporter into the world's largest coal importer, mercury in imported coals has become an increasingly significant source of atmospheric mercury pollution. The research of distribution characteristics of total mercury in imported coals could be a significant initiative for scientific assessment of the immigration risk of mercury in coal imports and protecting environment security. Based on the American Environmental Protection Agency method 7473, which is suitable for soil samples, sediments, sludge, wastewater and groundwater, total mercury concentrations in 123 imported coal samples at Shanghai Port were determined using a direct mercury analyzer. The robust statistical description of total mercury content in imported coals shows that the median of mercury concentrations in 123 imported coals is 0.043 mg/kg and the Norm IQR is 0.025 mg/kg. On the basis of Chinese coal industry standard MT/T 963—2005, the imported coals at Shanghai Port are mainly special low mercury coal and low mercury coal. It is worthy of attention that medium mercury coal and high mercury coal were found in Indonesian coals. The occurrence modes of mercury in coal affect its final emissions, which has a guiding significance on mercury removal technology. The correlation analysis of ash, sulfur and mercury content shows that the occurrence modes of mercury are mainly sulfide form in Indonesian coals and Russian coals based on the relationship between total mercury and sulfur content instead of ash content. According to the positive relationship between total mercury and sulfur content and the negative relationship between total mercury and ash content, the mercury was contained in organic matter in Canadian coals. According to the negative relationship between total mercury and sulfur content and the positive relationship between total mercury and ash content, the mercury was contained in aluminum silicate form in Australian coals. Compared to cold atomic absorption spectrometry, hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry and other traditional analysis methods, the direct mercury analyzer method for determination of mercury in coal established in this paper shorten the inspection process, improve work efficiency, and is worthy of popularization and application. The research of distribution characteristics of total mercury in imported coals could provide reference for scientific assessment of the immigration risk of mercury in imported coals and comprehensive utilization of imported coals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207