MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065505200

The effects of grazing and site productivity on Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: carabidea) in a semi-arid grassland

2009· article· en· W7065505200 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpecies richnessGrazingGrasslandTrophic levelAbundance (ecology)Productivity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The grasslands of British Columbia (BC), Canada are an important resource for the ranching industry, even though they occupy less than one percent of BC‟s land area. Cattle grazing can alter the structure and composition of the plant community, which may indirectly affect insect communities. Insects are an integral component of grassland ecosystems; for example, carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) prey on lower trophic levels while providing food resources for upper trophic levels. In the semi-arid grasslands of southern BC, soil-water availability increases with elevation, and plant community composition differs along the elevation (productivity) gradient. I investigated the effects of cattle grazing and productivity on ground beetle abundance, dried weight (biomass), species richness and diversity. Over three sessions of pitfall trapping in 2008 in Lac Du Bois BC Provincial Park, 600 individuals of six carabid species were captured. To test for main and interacting effects of elevation, grazing, and month of capture, carabid beetles were quantified by trap for abundance, dried weight (biomass), species richness and Shannon‟s diversity. I found that elevation was the most important predictor of carabid abundance, biomass, species richness and diversity. Lower elevation had an average abundance of 1.04 carabids, dried weight of 25.50 mg, species richness of 0.46 and Shannon diversity of 0.06, compared to upper elevation with an average abundance of 2.88 carabids, dried weight of 113.71 mg, species richness of 1.00 and Shannon diversity of 0.15. Grazing had a significant effect on carabid diversity with higher diversity in upper elevations. There were significant effects of month of capture on carabid beetle biomass, species richness, and Shannon diversity. To examine energy differences, calorimetry experiments were performed on the seeds of four dominant grasses (Poa sandbergii, Pseudoroegenaria spicata, Festuca campestris, and Poa pratensis) and on four carabid beetles (Carabus taedatus, Calosoma moniliatum, Amara obesa, and Cymindis borealis). Average calories per gram were significantly different between two dominant species of carabid, Cymindis borealis (3114.741 cal/g), and Carabus taedatus (5321.862 cal/g). Grass species did not differ in calories per gram of seed. Caloric value (calories per gram x gram) of carabids and seeds were higher in the upper grasslands compared to the lower grasslands. As one of three Provincial parks that protect natural grasslands, the management of Lac Du Bois benefits by considering biodiversity of all biota, including invertebrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it