El fenómeno campaniforme en el Cerro de la Encina (Monachil, Granada). Nuevas aportaciones al complejo cultural del sureste
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neste artigo vamos mostrar um conjunto de taças e fontes com decoraçao campaniforme procedentes do sítio arqueologico do Cerro de la Encina (Monachil, Granada) \nlocalizados em diferentes espaços que permaneceu inédito até agora. A abordagem tecnológica feita por estereoscopia nos permitiu distinguir duas areas de matérias-primas \nlocalizadas nos espaços imediatos, mas também aprofundar a existência de um povoado anterior sobre esses estágios mais conhecidos – como são o Bronze Argárico e o Bronze Final do Sudeste –, menor do que nas fases subsequentes. Observando os caracteres formais, as técnicas e os motivos decorativos comproba-se sua relaçao com as fases recentes do Cobre del Sureste. Assim, a situaçao do Cerro de la Encina responde a un povoado cujas elites económicas e sociais possuem, como assim fizeram no Cerro de la Virgen e Los Millares, um controle de produção desta cerâmica campaniforme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".