MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065541574

Differential Regulation of IgA+ B Cells in Vitro by Stromal Cells from Distinctive Anatomical Compartments

2017· dissertation· W7065541574 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2017
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStromal cellIn vitroBone marrowB cellCellProgenitor cellCellular differentiationSpleen
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

B cell development is regulated by stromal cells that form a supportive microenvironment. Bone marrow (BM), spleen (Sp), and the gut lamina propria (LP) constitute distinct anatomical compartments that support B cell differentiation. In order to examine the effect of stromal cells on IgA+ B cells, I developed an in vitro system to co-culture gut LP, BM, or Sp-derived stromal cells with B cell progenitors to characterize the signals to generate IgA+ B cells. In this study, I characterized optimal conditions for the in vitro generation of IgA+ B cells. I found that gut LP stromal cells promote IgA+ B cell accumulation through producing soluble stimulatory factors. In contrast, BM and Sp stromal cells impaired IgA+ B cell accumulation in vitro by inhibiting proliferation and differentiation of IgA+ B cells. These observations provide new insights into how stromal cells from different anatomical locations shape IgA+ B cell responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicRadiation Therapy and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207