MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065566956

The effect of combining and baling on canola stem, fibre extraction, and properties

2024· dissertation· en· W7065566956 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBast fibreRettingCanolaBreakageYield (engineering)Plant stem
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canola is the third largest source of vegetable oil globally and a potential lignocellulosic bast fibre source. This study investigates the impact of harvest machinery, operations on the fibre properties of canola. Collected stems came from three stages of harvest: pre-combine (control), post-combining (PC), and post-baling (PB). Visual inspection of canola stems revealed no stem breakage during the pre-combine stage, whereas severe mechanical damage was observed in stems from the combined and baled stages. This damage included splitting, sharp cuts, fibrillation, fractures, and stem compression. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis of fibres extracted from these damaged sections revealed defects such as longitudinal cracks, axial cracks, cracks (approximately 45° angle), cut fibres, and kinks. In contrast, no such cracks were observed in fibres from the pre-combine stage, and the severity of defects was significantly greater in fibres from stems subjected to baling. However, fibres from visually whole canola stems were extracted after 42 hours of treatment at 40oC in a closed-loop retting machine with two different water application rates: 225 ml/min (Zone 1) and 400 ml/min (Zone 2). The tension measured to extract fibres from the retted stems was significantly lower for the post-baling stage (0.211N) when compared with pre- and post-combine (0.341 and 0.314N). Analysis of stems from different harvest stages retted in different Zones confirmed that only post-baling significantly differed from the other stages and Zone was not a significant factor in extraction force. Fibre yield (%) was lowest for the baling stage, while the highest fibre yield was obtained from the pre-combine stage. Finally, individual fibres were tested for elastic modulus and tensile strength. In each test the first sign of break was used to evaluate the Young’s modulus and the tensile strength of the fibre. Each stage of harvest was equivalent in these fibre properties. The results of this study could be used to modify either baling practice or retting of baled stems to supply defect-free stems for the downstream canola fibre industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207