MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065602331

Dual-energy imaging in stroke : feasibility of dual-layer detector cone-beam computed tomography

2023· article· en· W7065602331 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Archive (Karolinska Institutet) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroradiologyStroke (engine)Computed tomographyImage qualityMiddle cerebral arteryImaging phantomTomographyImage noiseAcute stroke
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is increasingly available and used in the standard diagnostic setting of ischemic stroke patients. For stroke patients with suspected large vessel occlusion, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the interventional suite could be an alternative to CT to shorten door to thrombectomy time. This approach could potentially lead to an improved patient outcome. However, image quality in CBCT is typically limited by artifacts and poor differentiation between gray and white matter. A dual-layer detector CBCT (DL-CBCT) system could be used to separate photon energy spectra with the potential to increase visibility of clinically relevant features, and acquire additional information.
\n
\n
\n
\nPurpose: Paper I evaluated how a range of DECT virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) impact identification of early ischemic changes, compared to conventional polyenergetic CT images. Paper II characterized the performance of a novel DLCBCT system with regards to clinically relevant imaging features. Paper III & IV investigated if DL-CBCT VMIs are sufficient for stroke diagnosis in the interventional suite, compared to reference standard CT.
\n
\n
\n
\nMethods: Paper I was a retrospective single-center study including consecutive patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke caused by an occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery or proximal middle cerebral artery. Automated Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) results from conventional images and 40-120 keV VMI were generated and compared to reference standard CT ASPECTS. In paper II, a prototype dual-layer detector was fitted into a commercial interventional C-arm CBCT system to enable dual-energy acquisitions. Metrics for spatial resolution, noise and uniformity were gathered. Clinically relevant tissue and iodine substitutes were characterized in terms of effective atomic numbers and electron densities. Iodine quantification was performed and virtual non-contrast (VNC) images were evaluated. VMIs were reconstructed and used for CT number estimation and evaluation of contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) in relevant tissue pairings. In paper III and IV, a prospective single-center study enrolled consecutive participants with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke on CT. In paper III, hemorrhage detection accuracy, ASPECTS accuracy, subjective and objective image quality were evaluated on non-contrast DL-CBCT 75 keV VMI and compared to reference standard CT. In paper IV, intracranial arterial segment vessel visibility and artifacts were evaluated on intravenous DL-CBCT angiography (DL-CBCTA) 70 keV VMI and compared to CT angiography (CTA). In both paper III and IV, non-inferiority was determined by the exact binomial test with a one-sided lower performance boundary set to 80% (98.75% CI).
\n
\n
\n
\nMain results: In paper I, 24 patients were included. 70 keV VMI had the highest region-based ASPECTS accuracy (0.90), sensitivity (0.82) and negative predictive value (0.94), whereas 40 keV VMI had the lowest accuracy (0.77), sensitivity (0.34) and negative predictive value (0.80). In paper II, the prototype and commercial CBCT had a similar spatial resolution and noise using the same standard reconstruction. For all tissue substitutes, the mean accuracy in effective atomic number was 98.2% (SD 1.2%) and 100.3% (SD 0.9%) for electron density. Iodine quantification had a mean difference of -0.1 (SD 0.5) mg/ml compared to the true concentrations. For VNC images, iodine substitutes with blood averaged 43.2 HU, blood only 44.8 HU, iodine substitutes with water 2.6 HU. A noise-suppressed dataset showed a CNR peak at 40 keV VMI and low at 120 keV VMI. In the same dataset without noise suppression, peak CNR was seen at 70 keV VMI and a low at 120 keV VMI. CT numbers of various clinically relevant objects generally matched the calculated CT number in a wide range of VMIs. In paper III, 27 participants were included. One reader missed a small bleeding, however all hemorrhages were detected in the majority analysis (100% accuracy, CI lower boundary 86%, p=0.002). ASPECTS majority analysis had 90% accuracy (CI lower boundary 85%, p<0.001), sensitivity was 66% (individual readers 67%, 69% and 76%), specificity was 97% (97%, 96% and 89%). Subjective and objective image quality metrics were inferior to CT. In paper IV, 21 participants had matched image sets. After excluding examinations with scan issues, all readers considered DL-CBCTA non-inferior to CTA (CI boundary 93%, 84%, 80%, respectively), when assessing arteries relevant in candidates for intracranial thrombectomy. Artifacts were more prevalent compared to CTA.
\n
\n
\n
\nConclusions: In paper I, automated 70 keV VMI ASPECTS had the highest diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and negative predictive value overall. Different VMI energy levels impact the identification of early ischemic changes on DECT. In paper II, the DL-CBCT prototype system showed comparable technical metrics to a commercial CBCT system, while offering dual-energy capability. The dual-energy images indicated a consistent ability to separate and characterize clinically relevant tissues, blood and iodine. Thus, the DL-CBCT system could find utility in the diagnostic setting. In paper III, non-contrast DL-CBCT 75 keV VMI showed non-inferior hemorrhage detection and ASPECTS accuracy to CT. However, image quality was inferior compared to CT, and visualization of small subarachnoid hemorrhages after treatment remains a challenge. In the same stroke cohort, paper IV showed non-inferior vessel visibility for DL-CBCTA 70 keV VMI compared to CTA under certain conditions. Specifically, the prototype system had a long scan time and was not capable of bolus tracking which resulted in scan issues. After excluding participants with such issues, DL-CBCTA 70 keV VMI were found non-inferior to CTA.
\n
\n
\n
\nIn summary, the findings of this thesis indicate that DL-CBCT may be sufficient for stroke assessment in the interventional suite with the potential to bypass CT in patients eligible for thrombectomy. However, issues related to the prototype system and the visualization of small hemorrhages highlight the need of further development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Archive (Karolinska Institutet)Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207