MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065604688

Examination of the food safety system in the state of Qatar / by Allan Stirling

2017· other· en· W7065604688 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistrustPublicityPublic healthFood safetyPopulationProductivityHealth careFood securitySanitation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foodbome illness continues to be endemic in our global environment. Protecting the \nhuman host from exposure to foodbome pathogens and reducing the incidence of foodbome \nillness are the central goals of established food safety intervention programs at national levels. \nFoodbome illness is a significant contributor to morbidity figures and has a major economic \nimpact on global health care systems. For example, foodbome surveillance activities in the \nUnited States state that, "foodbome illnesses affect 6 to 80 million persons, cause 9, 000 deaths \nand cost an estimated 5 billion U.S. dollars annually? (Altekmse, Cohen, Swerdlow, 1997). \nMoreover, the consequences of foodbome illness in the public food service sector have an \nimpact on foodservice workers, the foodservice industry and the community. \nIf a business is implicated in a case of foodbome illness it can result in financial loss \nbecause of bad publicity and the subsequent loss of business, increased insurance premiums, a \nloss of consumer trust in the food supply and distrust in public health authorities responsible for \nthe protection of population health. ?In Canada, as many as 8.5 million Canadians \n(approximately 1 in 4 persons) are estimated to develop foodbome illness resulting in the \nhospitalization of 39 000 people and as many as 600 deaths? (Canadian Restaurant and \nFoodservices Association, 2003). The resultant burden on the health care system has been \nestimated at approximately 2 billion dollars annually (Canadian Restaurant and Foodservices \nAssociation, 2003). ?The majority of enteric disease is mild and requires only a day or two of \nreduced activities; however, these cases pose a significant burden due to lost of productivity and \nother related costs. In Ontario, about 1 in 313 cases of enteric disease are reported to the province through passive disease surveillance? (Majowicz, et al., 2004) suggesting that many \ncases are overlooked or ignored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University)Same topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207