Erratum: „The application of infrared spectroscopy to probe the surface morphology of alumina-supported palladium catalysts“ (J.Chem. Phys. 123, 174706 (2005))
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Erratum: The spectra presented in Fig. (a) have all been inadvertently shifted to high wavenumber, with respect to the wavenumber scale marked at the base of Fig. 5(b). No other part of the article is affected by this error. The spectral alignment is correct for Fig. 5(b) and the correct wavenumber values are discussed throughout the text, displayed in Fig. 9, and described in Table II. The corrected Fig. 5 is provided here. The heading for Sec. B.5 is incorrect. It should read "5. 1% PdCl2/alumina". The authors are grateful to Professor Paul Rowntree of the University of Sherbrooke for the correction of Fig. 5(a).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it