EFECTIVIDAD DEL EJERCICIO FÍSICO PARA DISMINUIR LA FATIGA EN PACIENTES CON CÁNCER DE MAMA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of exercise to reduce fatigue in patients with cancer.Material and Methods: Observational and retrospective systematic review of quantitative type, subjected to critical selection, using the Grade evaluation system for the identification of the degree of evidence, found in the following databases: Pubmed, Liliacs, Scielo, Epistemonikos.The 10 articles reviewed systematically, 100% (n = 10/10) is a systematic review.In relation to the provenance of the evidence, 20% (2/10) are from China, 10% (1/10) from Ireland, 10% (1/10) from the United States, 10% (1/10) from Brazil., 10% (1/10) of Costa Rica, 10% (1/10) of Cyprus, 10% (1/10) of Canada, 10% (1/10) of Germany and 10% (1/10) of England.Results: 90% (n = 9/10) indicates that exercise is effective to reduce fatigue in patients with cancer.The 10% (n = 1/10) point out that physical exercise impresses not to decrease the levels of fatigue in women with breast cancer who present the symptom.Conclusion: Exercise is effective in reducing fatigue in patients with cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".