El panel de madera contralaminada. Cerramiento ecoeficiente en España
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este estudio se centra en el panel contralaminado de madera, en relación a su uso como cerramiento en España, y su nivel de sostenibilidad y eficiencia. Se abordaran estos dos aspectos, a través de un análisis del impacto ambiental durante todo el ciclo de vida de los cerramientos. \nPor ello, nos centraremos en el panel como cerramiento, y como elemento eficiente, y sostenible, desde su fabricación hasta su papel en el edificio terminado. Esta visión global del impacto que produce, resultara de gran utilidad para conocer mejor este sistema constructivo bastante desconocido en nuestro país. \nPara su análisis, se ha propuesto un edificio de madera contralaminada y calculado su impacto, para compararlo después con el mismo modulo, construido con los cerramientos convencionales que predominan en nuestro país.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".