Diseño de un conjunto de componentes mecánicos para modificar un elevador telescópico en un desatador de rocas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El desatado de rocas representa el 30% de los accidentes fatales ocurridos en minería subterránea siendo considerado una actividad de alto riesgo; para disminuir este riesgo se introdujo al mercado un equipo auxiliar denominado Scaler; actualmente existen diferentes diseños, en su mayoría obtenidos por la conversión de equipos diseñados para la construcción y transporte de carga. La presente tesis muestra el diseño de un brazo hidráulico telescópico de sección rectangular con un alcance máximo de 5m cuyo equipamiento consta de: cilindros hidráulicos, martillo hidráulico, rodamiento de giro, motor hidráulico, bomba hidráulica, válvulas y mangueras, para convertir un elevador telescópico en un desatador de rocas cuya operación está enfocada en una sección de avance de 4mx4m (explotación mecanizada de vetas angostas). Por último, se usaron diversas herramientas computacionales como SolidWorks, Adams, Matchad y FluidSim; obteniéndose resultados en un menor tiempo y análisis iterativo en el desarrollo de la concepción del diseño.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".