MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065765900

Experimental evaluation of lifeboat evacuation performance

2001· article· en· W7065765900 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Research Council Canada (Government of Canada) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Resources CanadaTransport CanadaCanadian Association of Petroleum Producers
KeywordsOffshore oil and gasPetroleum industryRange (aeronautics)Maritime industrySubmarine pipelineTest (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results are presented from a model tank test program designed to evaluate the performance of lifeboat evacuation in a range of environmental conditions.The aim of the program is to provide objective, reliable data concerning particular aspects of evacuation performance, which can be used by designers, regulators, and others in their decision-making.As the shipping industry follows the offshore oil and gas industry in requiring more rigorous management of safety, and as both industries and their regulators move increasingly toward performance standards rather than prescriptive rules, the availability of such information becomes a necessity for assessing and managing risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Research Council Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207