El valor de un título: el Tratado de Prohibición del Arma Nuclear y su impacto en el régimen de no proliferación.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recent conclusion of a Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons opens a new\nchapter in the recent history of nuclear disarmament and the non-proliferation regime. It\nis a “sui generis instrument”, since countries taking part in the negotiations do not possess\nthe weapons that are covered by the convention\nIn addition, the process leading to the adoption of this new treaty shares some\ncharacteristics with two conventions in the field of conventional weapons with nondiscriminated\nhumanitarian impact: the Mine-Ban Convention (or Ottawa Convention) and\nthe Cluster Munition Convention (or Oslo Convention).\nThis article focuses on differences and similarities between the three processes, with the\naim of giving an answer to the following question: can “like-minded states conventions” –\ntheir spirit, dynamics and goals- be efficiently adapted to the rules of nuclear\ndisarmament?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".