Fenway, Wrigley most expensive ballparks to see a game
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With baseball in full swing, here's what it costs to see your favorite teams play. Baseball season is here...and for fans, taking in America's favorite past time means a big investment...and for some that cost is more than others... Financial website Go Banking Rates did the math, breaking down the cost for two adults to attend a game around the league... It found on average, it cost 77 dollar and 92 cents...and that gets you two tickets, two hot dogs, a couple beers and parking... Fans pay the most at Boston's Fenway park where the total is more than double at 157 dollars. Chicago Cubs home Wrigley Field comes in at number two...with an average cost of a little over 116 dollars... The New York Yankees, Toronto Blue Jays and Seattle Mariners round out the top five... Heading to Los Angeles will help you cut costs at the park... The average price for two to go to a Dodgers game is a little over 55 bucks... While the Angel come in at the cheapest...at just under 48 dollars for a night at the ballpark.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.123 | 0.380 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".