MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065818948

EXAMINING FOOD PRESERVATION PARTICIPATION WITHIN INDIGENOUS AND LOCAL FOOD SYSTEMS ON CANADA'S WEST COAST

2022· dissertation· en· W7065818948 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersClayoquot Biosphere Trust
KeywordsIndigenousFood systemsLivelihoodConceptualizationCitizen journalismParticipatory action researchTraditional knowledgeEntitlement (fair division)ProvisioningQualitative research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research and policy attention in Canada's food-insecure rural and remote areas has focused \non the country’s north, with less known about the challenges that affect remote southern \ncoastal regions. Similarly, programs to improve local food provisioning among adults and \nyouth tend to prioritize food procurement and nutritional education over food preservation, \ndespite the importance of food preservation competencies for maintaining year-round access \nto seasonal food from Indigenous and local food systems (ILFSs). Research is needed to \nbetter understand how diverse residents of coastal communities can benefit from establishing \nfood preservation practices. This dissertation examines food preservation participation in the \nClayoquot Sound Biosphere Region on Canada's west coast, using a qualitative research \ndesign informed by community based participatory research and Indigenous research \npractices and principles. Participatory workshops were used to deliver food preservation \ntraining. Data were gathered using semi-structured interviews, written evaluations of the \nworkshops, and document analysis. The findings are reported across three interconnected \npapers. The first paper presents a joint conceptualization of ILFSs that acknowledges the \nexistence of shared food practices between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people in \nlocalized food systems. This contrasts with dominant conceptualizations that consider \nIndigenous food systems and local food systems separately, regardless of contexts. The \nsecond paper uses a social practice framework to show that programs that support food \npreservation competency building, materials provisioning, and continuous participation allow \npeople to make meaning out of such engagement, which is critical for establishing food \npreservation practice in a community. The third paper focuses on the role of youth in ILFSs, \nshowing that young people need to be involved in co-designing food preservation programs if \nsuch initiatives are to meet their needs and interests. These findings demonstrate that the\nvalue of jointly conceptualizing ILFS lies in identifying shared food practices in regions \nwhere Indigenous and settler populations co-exist, which research and policy can prioritize to \nimprove food security. They also show the power of a social practice framework to support\nparticipant-focused assessment of local food preservation programs. Additionally, the \nfindings show that food preservation programs can help youth build food knowledge to \nimprove their food security and support their communities' food sovereignty

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it