EXAMINING FOOD PRESERVATION PARTICIPATION WITHIN INDIGENOUS AND LOCAL FOOD SYSTEMS ON CANADA'S WEST COAST
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Research and policy attention in Canada's food-insecure rural and remote areas has focused \non the country’s north, with less known about the challenges that affect remote southern \ncoastal regions. Similarly, programs to improve local food provisioning among adults and \nyouth tend to prioritize food procurement and nutritional education over food preservation, \ndespite the importance of food preservation competencies for maintaining year-round access \nto seasonal food from Indigenous and local food systems (ILFSs). Research is needed to \nbetter understand how diverse residents of coastal communities can benefit from establishing \nfood preservation practices. This dissertation examines food preservation participation in the \nClayoquot Sound Biosphere Region on Canada's west coast, using a qualitative research \ndesign informed by community based participatory research and Indigenous research \npractices and principles. Participatory workshops were used to deliver food preservation \ntraining. Data were gathered using semi-structured interviews, written evaluations of the \nworkshops, and document analysis. The findings are reported across three interconnected \npapers. The first paper presents a joint conceptualization of ILFSs that acknowledges the \nexistence of shared food practices between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people in \nlocalized food systems. This contrasts with dominant conceptualizations that consider \nIndigenous food systems and local food systems separately, regardless of contexts. The \nsecond paper uses a social practice framework to show that programs that support food \npreservation competency building, materials provisioning, and continuous participation allow \npeople to make meaning out of such engagement, which is critical for establishing food \npreservation practice in a community. The third paper focuses on the role of youth in ILFSs, \nshowing that young people need to be involved in co-designing food preservation programs if \nsuch initiatives are to meet their needs and interests. These findings demonstrate that the\nvalue of jointly conceptualizing ILFS lies in identifying shared food practices in regions \nwhere Indigenous and settler populations co-exist, which research and policy can prioritize to \nimprove food security. They also show the power of a social practice framework to support\nparticipant-focused assessment of local food preservation programs. Additionally, the \nfindings show that food preservation programs can help youth build food knowledge to \nimprove their food security and support their communities' food sovereignty
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle