Fêtes et rituels dans la migration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La chanson, la musique, les fêtes et les rituels nous valent dix articles et notes de recherche qui analysent le contenu et la diversité de pratiques culturelles de groupes migrants. Les auteurs canadiens, français et australiens interrogent les dimensions existentielles et symboliques d'expressions identitaires produites dans des situations et des contextes différents : quartiers multiculturels, carnavals populaires, fêtes associatives, rituels communautaires... Ils questionnent enfin la manière dont se constituent, souvent contre l'ordre établi et les normes instituées, des espaces de"bricolage" culturel. L'étude des pratiques festives et des rituels dans l'immigration se prête à comprendre la capacité des acteurs à maintenir, à transmettre et à aménager, voire à réinventer, des éléments de leur culture. Certaines célébrations vécues dans l'intimité ne concernent que les membres d'un groupe particulier, mais d'autres plus spectaculaires et ludiques se déroulent dans la ville ou le quartier, complexifiant les rapports sociaux à l'échelle locale et transformant le rapport aux lieux des populations, migrantes ou non.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".