Emil L. FACKEMHEIM, The God Within: Kant, Schelling and Historicity, J. Burbidge (ed.), University of Toronto Press, Toronto 1996,252 pp., 16 x 23, 5. ISBN 0-8020-0697-3. [RESEÑA]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESEÑASEste volumen tercero recoge las religiones no cristianas de mayor incidencia en la sociedad española.Ya en el segundo volumen, aparecido en 1983, se recogían las más importantes (judaísmo, Islam, Fe baha'i, budismo e hinduismo).Con todo, este tercer volumen las ha recogido de nuevo, separándolas del tratamiento conjunto con los sectas (aunque ya aparecían bien distinguidas de las anteriores).Además, incluye un nuevo ca-pÍtulo sobre las religiones tradicionales africanas y americanas, que en los últimos años han cobrado un cierto relieve debido a la llegada de ciudadanos de aquellos países a nuestra tierra.Pero quizá la mayor novedad del volumen -yen esto probablemente está presente • el deseo de reflexionar sobre las religiones no cristianas, tal y como pedía Juan Pablo II en la Carta «Tertio millenio adveniente»-estriba en la inclusión de varios estudios a cargo de teólogos españoles sobre el fenomeno religioso en general a. Martín V elasco), la «teología de
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".