The Eglise Du Temple Of Paris And The English “Round Churches Movement”: New \narchaeological updates and missing data for a phenomenology of architectural \nreproduction “ad instar Sancti Sepulcri”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under Capetians patronage, Knights Templars’ power achieved in French territory in the first half of the XII century allowed to establish their principal commandery in the northern periphery of Paris, where they built a round-naved church, renewed in the first quarter of XIII century with the addition of a long single aisle chancel and in the ‘40s with a two-level porch on the western façade. Despite the building survived Order’s suppression, it was definitively dismantled by the order of Napoleon I at the beginnings of the XIX century. \n \nThe archaeological surveys carried out in 2011 unearthed the chancel’s apse but a new investigation provides further archaeological and archivistic details on the chapel’s Romanesque phase, certifying its belonging to the group of architectural reproductions of the Holy Sep-ulchre Church arisen in Western Europe from the XII to the XIII centuries. \n \nArchaeological excavations in the Holy Land model, carried out by the University of Rome “La Sapienza”, in addiction to micro-interventions conducted on its Western copies, offer the opportunity to reconsider different buildings’ chronologies till anchored to out-dated observations. On the same way enables to establish once and for all the relations between the Parisian church and the ichnograph-ically cohesive group of English foundations like the Old Temple Church, New Temple Church and St. John Clerkenwell (London), Tem-ple Bruer (Lincolnshire), Holy Sepulchre (Cambridge), Holy Sepulchre (Northampton) and Temple Church (Bristol).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".