MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065906012

GPA IGR-2 Highlights: Tuesday, 17 October 2006. Oceans Library

2006· article· en· W7065906012 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFlanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of EnvironmentUdenrigsministerietEuropean CommissionNew Zealand Foreign Affairs and TradeDepartment for International DevelopmentAustralian GovernmentGovernment of CanadaMinistry of Economy, Trade and IndustryU.S. Department of State
KeywordsGeneral partnershipCommissionPublishingMarine researchInformation systemFishing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Workshop Chair Jan Haspeslagh, Flanders Marine Institute, noted the aim to create a partnership between the Oceans Library and the GPA. Delegates heard presentations on: existing library networks; the establishment of regional and international library alliances; achievements of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and the Ocean Data and Information Network for Africa; the Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts database; open access publishing and repositories; and the Integrated Marine Information System. Discussions focused on furthering dialogue on a potential Oceans Library and GPA partnership.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it